
Unlike standard LeetCode interviews, Palantir’s decomposition interview is open-ended, meaning how it’s structured is up to me. It starts with a large amount of coding, then expands into high-level system and architectural design. Simply put, it’s about breaking down complex problems and adapting as new requirements are added.
I am really grateful for the tool Linkjob AI, and that's also why I'm sharing my interview insights here. Having an invisible AI interview assistant during the interview is indeed very convenient.
When I first heard about the Palantir decomposition interview, I expected another round of coding problems or a technical phone screen. I quickly learned that this interview stands out. The Palantir decomposition interview usually lasts about an hour. Instead of just writing code, I had to solve a high-level, real-world problem. The focus was on breaking down the problem, thinking about the end user, and communicating my ideas clearly.
Here’s a quick look at the structure:
Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
Duration | About 1 hour |
Format | Onsite technical round |
Focus | Solve a real-world problem with strong problem decomposition and user focus |
Structure | Two parts: 1) Ideation (breakdown and solutions), 2) Execution (high-level design) |
Coding Requirement | Minimal coding, maybe some pseudocode; mostly discussion-based |
Behavioral Questions | Mixed in, about 20 minutes during the interview |
Importance | Core part of the Palantir interview process |
Preparation | Master problem decomposition techniques, do mock interviews, learn Palantir’s culture |
During the Palantir decomposition interview, I faced a mix of behavioral and technical questions. The interviewer wanted to see how I handled open-ended challenges, how I broke down complex issues, and how I explained my thinking.
The Palantir decomposition interview felt different from a typical technical phone screen. I had to use problem decomposition techniques, not just for technical questions but also for behavioral ones. Here are some skills I needed:
Problem decomposition: I had to break big problems into smaller, manageable parts.
Logical reasoning and data handling.
Using pseudocode to show my thought process.
Clarifying unclear requirements and data.
Designing low-level systems, like a chess game or parking lot.
Thinking about the end user and trade-offs.
Handling ambiguity and uncertainty.
Communicating my approach clearly.
I found the biggest challenge was the ambiguity. The interviewer did not always give clear directions. I had to organize my thoughts and explain my steps out . The pressure made it easy to lose track or rush.
So, I used Linkjob AI in this interview. It helped me organize my thoughts, suggested the next steps, and provided reference code. I explained my plan to the interviewer. After they confirmed, I wrote the code and let Linkjob AI handle the debugging.


Here are the most common mistakes I found while going over Palantir decomposition interview experiences. Avoid these if you want to pass.
Many candidates jump straight into a solution the moment they hear an open-ended question. They start talking before they have a clear plan, thinking speed equals confidence.
The Reality: Rushing often leads to rambling and missing key points. The interviewer isn't looking for speed; they want to see your thinking process. Jumping the gun makes you look unprepared and often leads to misunderstanding the core problem.
A frequent pitfall is failing to break down the problem sufficiently. This interview is specifically designed to see how you split a "messy" scenario into manageable parts.
Common Failure Patterns:
Jumping to solutions: Moving straight to code or features before mapping out the problem.
Skipping the outline: Forgetting to define main components or ask clarifying questions.
Scattered logic: Without a structure, answers feel disorganized, and you lose the chance to show you can handle complexity.
It’s easy to feel good about a solution that covers the "happy path" while completely ignoring tricky situations.
The Trap: Candidates often focus so much on the main requirements that they freeze when asked, "What if the system is at capacity?" or "What if the data is corrupted?" In a decomposition interview, the ability to anticipate what could go wrong is just as important as the solution itself.
Some assume that a correct technical answer is enough. However, being unable to explain the reasoning behind a choice is a major red flag.
Typical Issues:
Over-complicating: Using excessive jargon or long, winding sentences that confuse the interviewer.
Monologues: Speaking for too long without checking in, which disconnects you from the interviewer.
Weak Communication Example | How to Improve |
|---|---|
Using too much jargon | Use simple, everyday words |
Speaking in long monologues | Break answers into short steps |
Not checking for understanding | Ask, “Does that make sense so far?” |
I learned that slowing down actually helps me deliver better answers. Here’s what worked for me:
I always begin by asking clarifying questions, as it’s one of the most effective techniques for approaching and solving coding interview questions. This helps me fully understand the problem before I try to solve it.
I use the STAR method to ace industry interviews—Situation, Task, Action, Result—to organize my answers. This keeps my thoughts clear and structured.
I write down answers to common questions as practice. This helps me spot gaps in my thinking.
I practice my answers, sometimes in front of a mirror. Watching my body language helps me feel more confident.
I do mock interviews with friends or mentors who give honest feedback.
I remind myself to pause and breathe before answering. This small habit helps me slow down and think clearly.
These preparation strategies help me manage nerves and communicate more clearly during the interview. I noticed that when I take my time, I avoid missing important details and show my real problem-solving skills.
I realized that breaking down problems step by step is the heart of the palantir decomposition interview. Systematic decomposition helps me tackle even the most complex questions. Here’s how I approach it:
I start by clarifying the problem. I ask questions to make sure I understand what the interviewer wants.
I consider different ways to solve the problem. Sometimes I talk through a brute force solution before moving to something more efficient.
I use frameworks like logic trees or the MECE principle (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) to split big problems into smaller parts.
I explain my thought process .Here, I will thoroughly review the different schemes and ideas provided by the AI, then select the one I consider the most reasonable and proceed to answer.
This method makes my answers more organized and easier to follow. Interviewers want to see how I break down problems and adapt my approach in real time. Practicing these problem decomposition techniques during mock interviews reduces my anxiety and helps me perform better.
This is a list of some common edge case questions.
What happens if the input is empty or invalid?
How does the system behave under heavy load?
Are there any special user requirements?
What if something goes wrong—like a network failure or full storage?
How do I handle errors or unexpected data?
I run through this checklist during my preparation and mock interviews,It gives me confidence that I won’t get caught off guard by follow-up questions.
Clear communication is just as important as technical skill in the palantir decomposition interview. I used to struggle with this, but I found some preparation strategies that really helped:
I do role-playing exercises with friends. We take turns being the interviewer and candidate. This helps me practice explaining my ideas in simple language.
I join group workshops or study groups. Working with others improves my active listening and teamwork.
I seek feedback on my tone, clarity, and nonverbal cues. Sometimes I record myself and listen for filler words or confusing explanations.
I focus on behavioral interview questions too. Sharing real stories from my experience helps me connect with the interviewer.
These methods make me more confident and adaptable. Practicing communication in different settings prepares me for anything the interview might throw at me.
I make sure to get enough sleep and eat well before the big day. These small habits make a big difference. When I feel nervous, I try to reframe it as excitement. This mindset shift helps me turn anxiety into energy. I have seen how these techniques work for others too. For example, a software developer I know managed a high-stress system outage by staying organized and communicating clearly. That story reminds me that composure and preparation go hand in hand.
Even with all my mock interviews and preparation, I sometimes face questions in a live interview that catch me off guard. That’s where Linkjob’s Real-Time AI Interview Assistant steps in. Whether it's Palantir's Decomposition interview or other interviews, AI can be used, because during the interview process, Linkjob will listen in real-time and identify the questions. Then, it will provide instant, contextually relevant answer suggestions based on my resume and the job description.
If you want to boost your confidence and land your dream role, combine smart preparation with tools that support you every step of the interview.

Palantir decomposition interview focuses more on problem decomposition and communication. Instead of just solving coding problems, I need to break down real-world scenarios and explain my thinking. The technical phone screen usually tests coding skills only.
The coolest thing about AI is that it can keep asking follow-up questions based on your answers. This helped me spot weak areas and improve my preparation strategies before the real palantir interview process.
I always start with problem decomposition techniques. I practice with mock interviews, review common scenarios, and focus on clear communication. I also study past interview questions and work on my interview preparation every day.
When I get a surprise question, I pause and clarify the requirements. I use problem decomposition to break it down. Linkjob.ai can support selecting different large models as the basis for answers. I personally prefer to choose Grok, as its answer quality is relatively high and it's also more suitable for answering difficult questions.
Yes, I use these tips for many interviews, not just the palantir interview process. Problem decomposition, mock interviews, and strong preparation work for coding problems and other roles too.
How I Passed My Palantir New Grad SWE Interview in 2025
My Step-by-Step Palantir Interview Process and Actual Questions in 2025