I am certain you can master the McKinsey Solve Game by employing effective strategies, as I have done so myself. I am not much of a gamer, but I specifically prepared for my McKinsey Solve Game and passed. I'll walk you through my interview process and then break down the strategies I employed. But overall, I recommend you learn how to break down complex problems into clear, actionable steps.
The PSG is divided into three parts: Ecosystem (35 minutes), Redrock (35 minutes), and The Sea Wolf (30 minutes). The core objective of the Ecosystem game is to build a sustainable biological habitat. In Redrock, you need to complete a research report and six cases, with a recommended time allocation of 2:1 for these. Finally, The Sea Wolf requires you to match microorganisms to three contaminated sites.
In fact, I rarely hear about companies that use a gamified approach for interviews. I actually find it quite interesting. This unique test uses an ecological-themed game that challenges my ability to quickly identify the core of a problem and then use strategy to achieve a goal in a limited amount of time. Here is my experience:
I built self-sustaining ecosystems by selecting species and managing environmental factors.
Each game version felt unique. The system gave me different terrains, species, and constraints.
The games tested my ability to solve problems, make decisions, and adapt quickly to new information.
The purpose of McKinsey Solve goes beyond testing knowledge. It measures how I approach complex, real-world problems.
Game Category | Key Tasks | Skills Tested |
---|---|---|
Constrained Optimization | Build ecosystems, relocate animals after disasters | Data analysis, logical reasoning, decision-making |
Strategy and Adaption | Manage invasive species, allocate migration resources | Analytical thinking, resource management |
Cause vs Effect | Diagnose disease causes and treatments | Pattern recognition, cause-effect analysis |
Here’s what stood out to me:
The test evaluates my analytical and quantitative reasoning, data interpretation, and logical thinking.
The assessment rewards practical problem-solving skills, not just raw intelligence. I had to prioritize, estimate, and use shortcuts, just like in real consulting work.
Many candidates struggle with time management, not ability. I focused on practicing under timed conditions to improve my speed and accuracy.
By understanding the format and purpose of McKinsey Solve, I prepared myself to think strategically and act decisively during the assessment.
When I play the McKinsey Ecosystem Game (also known as the McKinsey Food Chain Game), my biggest wins have come from carefully managing the species interactions and energy flows.
This section requires you to select eight species from a biological database, and they must meet survival requirements like energy consumption, temperature, and food chain needs (for example, a tropical rainforest species can't be placed in the Arctic). Then you need to choose the optimal geographical location. After you submit, the system will simulate the ecological stability. My trick is to prioritize creating closed-loop food chains like "plants -> herbivores -> carnivores," and to avoid selecting too many species that use the same resources.
Here's some more detailed advice:
Start with Plants: I begin by introducing plants that thrive in the available environment. These will form the base of the food chain and support herbivores.
Add Herbivores Next: Once there’s enough plant biomass, I introduce herbivores that feed exclusively on those plants. I check their reproduction rates and energy efficiency.
Then Add Carnivores (But Carefully): I bring in carnivores only when the herbivore population is stable. Adding too many too fast collapses the chain.
Avoid Invasive Species: If there’s an option to remove or avoid an invasive species, I do it early because they tend to destabilize everything.
Balance the Ratios: I make sure there’s enough prey for every predator. If I notice a bottleneck, I backtrack and adjust the ecosystem manually.
Monitor Energy Flow: I closely monitor the energy bar and food web diagrams. And if energy flow drops below a threshold, I change my species mix.
Keystone Species: If a keystone species is available (one that stabilizes multiple interactions), I prioritize introducing it.
The core objective of this game is to match microorganisms to three contaminated sites. Just like before, I'll explain how I approached it:
I created profiles for each site, noting details like the temperature (e.g., ≥60°C) and the type of pollutants. Then, I selected microorganisms from the database that had to simultaneously meet three attributes (like heat resistance and decomposition efficiency) and four characteristics. After that, I had to choose three microorganisms and calculate their average values.
A helpful tip for this part is to create a comparison table that lists the site requirements and the microorganism attributes. You can then use a filter function to quickly find the right matches. For example, if a site requires heat resistance of ≥60°C, you can directly filter for the corresponding microorganisms.
For more on this, you can check out my other post that offers a detailed introduction to the McKinsey Solve Game's Sea Wolf section.
This section requires you to complete a research report and several cases. It's divided into three phases: investigation, analysis, and reporting. Here’s what I did in each phase:
Investigation Phase: I filtered for key data from climate trend charts and species population tables. It's especially important here to first look at the title of the chart and the axes.
Analysis Phase: When calculating growth rates, you can use quick calculation formulas, for example: (current value - base value) / base value * 100%
.
Reporting Phase: Using a "problem-data-conclusion" structure for your report will make it much clearer and more specific.
Here's a little trick: practice with timed real questions. Also, get into the habit of first looking at the timeline and marking any abnormal values. For instance, if a species' population suddenly plummets in a certain year, that could be a key variable. If you want to practice with real questions, you can use the mock interviews on Linkjob.
Ready to put these strategies to the McKinsey Solve test?
The best way to master the McKinsey Solve Game is through hands-on practice. Use Linkjob's mock interviews to simulate the real test environment, apply these strategies, and build the confidence you need to succeed.
The McKinsey Imbellus Test, now known as the McKinsey Solve Game, is designed to assess core skills essential for a successful career in management consulting. The game measures how candidates approach and solve complex problems under pressure. Here's a breakdown of the key skills the test evaluates:
The test measures your ability to solve complex, unstructured problems. It does this by putting you in dynamic scenarios that require you to interpret data, make decisions, and prioritize actions to achieve a specific outcome.
You'll be challenged to:
Break down a complex problem into smaller, manageable parts.
Define a clear objective and establish measurable goals.
Make quick, strategic decisions under time pressure.
This section evaluates how you analyze data, think on your feet, and manage limited resources to achieve a quantifiable result.
McKinsey uses this assessment to evaluate your critical thinking and logical reasoning. The scenarios test your ability to apply structured thinking, identify the root cause of a problem, and formulate a clear, actionable solution. This skill is also vital for handling tough McKinsey interview questions.
The test assesses your ability to:
Use a structured approach (like the Pyramid Principle or MECE) to organize your thoughts.
Identify and challenge underlying assumptions.
Formulate a logical, data-driven conclusion.
This skill is crucial for handling complex client issues where you must go beyond surface-level analysis to find the core problem.
The test evaluates your capacity for systems thinking, which is the ability to see the bigger picture and understand how different elements within a system interact. The ecological scenarios, for example, are designed to test your understanding of cause-and-effect relationships and ripple effects. This skill is also a key part of the McKinsey case interview.
The game challenges you to:
Recognize patterns and connections within a complex system.
Understand how one decision can impact multiple elements.
Analyze the broader implications of your actions.
This skill is vital in consulting, where a single recommendation can have widespread effects on a business or organization.
I always start my preparation with rigorous mock interviews. Practicing in a realistic environment helps me build confidence and improve my skills. I use AI tools like Linkjob to simulate a real interviewer. For example, when practicing research report and case interview questions like those in Redrock, these tools give me instant feedback and highlight areas for improvement.
When I review my answers using the feedback from the tools, I can observe my own thought process and learn how to communicate more clearly. I've found that reviewing my performance on video helps me catch mistakes I might normally miss. This approach is very similar to the feedback-driven culture at top consulting firms.
While interview strategies and techniques are essential, your on-the-spot performance is what matters most in the McKinsey Solve Game. To gain an edge, I used Linkjob's real-time AI interview assistant. This tool can see my interview questions, listen to the conversation, instantly detect problems, and offer smart answer suggestions. I can see key points and structured responses in real time, which helps me stay focused and avoid mistakes.
Optimized for finance interviews, Linkjob's real-time support is especially crucial for the unique demands of the McKinsey Solve. Instant feedback and smart suggestions help me address unexpected questions and improve my answers during the interview, instead of only thinking of better solutions and responses after it's over.
I always focus on clear strategies to win. I practice under timed conditions, break down problems, and use real-time feedback to improve. I combine deep preparation with smart tools like Linkjob. This approach helps me stay calm and adapt quickly. I encourage you to use these methods and approach your next assessment with confidence and the right resources.
I set a timer before practice sessions and focus on quick decision-making and avoid overthinking. I use practice games to build speed.
I use AI tools like Linkjob. I listen carefully to each question. I organize my thoughts before speaking. I review instant feedback and adjust my approach for the next question.
Practice with mock interviews
Analyze feedback after each session
I practice with a variety of scenarios. I use mock interviews to simulate surprises. I stay calm and think logically. I rely on frameworks to structure my answers.