
I remember when LockedIn AI's system messed up my interview for the first time. The app suddenly froze. Then, it flagged me for using another app, which almost got me accused of cheating and cost me the job.
My confidence took a hit, so I checked my device settings, but kept running into problems, and a refund was nowhere in sight. These issues made it clear that I was in need of a better solution.
After reading a bunch of articles on the best alternatives to LockedIn AI and checking out other AI interview assistant tools (I've written a few reviews, like the Sensei AI review and the Cluely review), I decided to go with Linkjob AI to help out with my interviews. If you're curious and want to know more, just keep reading my story about how I demystified LockedIn AI.


While getting ready for my interview, I started noticing some red flags about LockedIn AI's subpar code. I actually noticed this when I was doing some early research into its ratings, like LockedIn AI's Trustpilot score:

I also found some reviews of LockedIn AI on Reddit:

But I decided to go ahead with the trial anyway, hoping for the best. It seemed hard to believe that an interview assistant charging so much ($119.88/mo) could be so useless, but I soon regretted it. Here are the main problems I had with LockedIn AI trash during my trial:
The answers felt pretty basic, like they were just thrown together by an outdated generative AI model.
It was a perfect fit, with no need to go through a trial-and-error process.
The explanations don't line up with the code.
It totally ignores edge cases or potential errors.
The tone is robotic—so stiff, in fact, that it doesn't help with the interview at all; instead, it actually hinders my progress.

Another problem with Lockedin Trash is that it sometimes gives me the wrong answers and makes my interview process feel really stressful.
I remember one time when I was about to answer a question, but the whole process froze right as I was about to hit send. I couldn't get the transcript or the answer in the time I had. That delay threw me off my train of thought.
Another time, my buddy and I were doing a mock interview, and she could see the Lockedin AI pop-up the entire time, so she asked me what mode ChatGPT was set to and why the answers were so vague.
What's the worst part? Interviewers and online assessment platforms are able to pick up on these irregularities—and so does Lockedin AI. They use tools to see if you're switching tabs, keep an eye on the tabs you're using, and even track your eye movements. Here's a quick rundown of the tools they usually use:
Detection Method | Description |
|---|---|
Candidate Snapshot Verification | Takes periodic images during interviews to confirm the same person remains in front of the camera. |
Browser Focus and Behaviour Signals | Tracks if candidates switch tabs or windows, indicating potential answer searching. |
Shared Script/Cheating Detection | Analyzes similarity patterns to uncover cases of unusually alike responses across candidates. |
Identity Verification | Confirms candidate identity through photo ID and selfie checks. |
Automated Behaviour Monitoring | Tracks eye movement and facial behaviour to flag signs of external help. |
Secure Browser & Lockdown Tools | Prevents access to unauthorized websites during assessments. |
AI-Assisted Proctoring | Monitors webcam and screen activity to detect suspicious behaviour. |
Session Logs & Reports | Provides detailed activity logs for recruiter review after assessments. |
It's pretty clear that Lockedin AI gets blocked by HR's anti-cheating measures in all sorts of ways. In fact, it even got me in trouble once. That's pretty bad, so I had no choice but to look for a safer AI interview assistant.

Lockedin Trash's answers are often not in line with the questions they're asked. Sometimes, the AI ignores the prompt or gives outdated info. Usually, I have to sift through a bunch of rambling AI output to find any useful info, and sometimes I just get so frustrated that I give up and start answering on my own.
I've learned to look at every output closely and ask myself, "Does this actually answer the question?" I've been talking to my friends in the field to see if they think the AI's answers are out of line with the difficulty of my interviews, and almost all of them are saying they are.
If the AI's answers seem off to you — either illogical or out of place — then it's time to consider a different option.
I had a tough time with the technical aspects of the interview because of the glitches in Lockedin AI. I was also pretty anxious before and during the interview because of it. I remember sitting in front of my laptop, praying for a stable internet connection and hoping the AI wouldn't freeze up. I noticed the following issues:
The constant technical issues made me feel even more overwhelmed.
The AI's responses were pretty much on autopilot, with no way to adjust them mid-flight.
Even after entering detailed job descriptions ahead of time, I still couldn't get responses tailored to the position.
If the company had used a different proctoring system or software, I would have been caught right away.
These issues made it impossible for me to concentrate. Honestly, I was totally blank. I raced through my answers, and I almost got caught cheating. The whole thing was because of the problems with Lockedin AI. I could've used a different tool, so I wouldn't have been left with no options in so many situations, or been unable to perform at my best. At the end of the day, I pretty much stopped daring to use Lockedin AI to help with interviews.
Here's what I suggest: If you're feeling stressed before an interview, take a breather and see if your tools are helping or hurting you.
When I saw how much I had paid for LockedIn AI—a terrible service—I expected to get more in return. The price tag guaranteed better results and higher salaries, but in the end, the service wasn't what I paid for.
I've seen a lot of users sharing their data and experiences on third-party platforms like Reddit and Trustpilot. Some people found jobs they love, but many more aren't satisfied with their salaries. Some people are even saying that the developers are messing with the reviews, so I think this is a big red flag.


I've been dealing with a lot of AI garbage from LockedIn, and it's made me realize that I needed a smarter way to pick my next AI assistant. I was looking for something reliable, transparent, and actually helpful, since I didn't want to jump from one problem to another. Here's how I went about it and what I learned.
First, I made a checklist. I just wanted to be sure that my next AI assistant would avoid repeating past mistakes. I was on the lookout for tools that put fairness, transparency, and user control first. Here's the table I used to compare the different options:
Criteria | Description |
|---|---|
Individual Fairness | Makes sure similar users get similar results. |
Bias Audits | Uses tools to check for bias and shares those results. |
Transparency & Explainability | Explains how the AI makes decisions, not just the final answer. |
Accountability & Governance | Keeps humans in charge and responsible for outcomes. |
Relevance & Utility | Solves real problems and adds value to my prep. |
I also made a point of looking into and asking about the following questions:
Can the AI explain its answers in a way that makes sense to me?
Can you show me the models I've got options for, and is that list going to be updated?
Is it possible to remain completely invisible? Can it help you have an invisible experience on different interview platforms and meeting apps?
How responsive is the customer service? If I need a refund or run into a bug, can I get customer service on the ball and get a response quickly?
I didn’t want to make the same mistake twice. I compared several AI assistants, looking at accuracy, privacy, and user satisfaction. I learned that high accuracy on paper doesn’t always mean better results. For example, if an AI gets 85% of steps right, a long interview can still go off track. I also noticed that many people, like me, felt uneasy about privacy. Over half of users said they didn’t feel comfortable sharing personal info with AI tools.
Here’s what I paid attention to:
Accuracy: Does the AI stick to the interview structure? Does it keep my stories clear and on point?
Privacy: Does the tool collect only what it needs? Does it tell me how my answers are used?
User Satisfaction: Do people trust the tool? Can I override the AI if I disagree with its feedback?
I read reviews and tried out demos. I looked for platforms that let me take control, not just follow along blindly. I saw a study where doctors trusted AI too much and accepted wrong answers. That made me realize how important it is to have the option to step in and make corrections.
After thinking about it for a while and testing out a few options, I decided to go with Linkjob AI, which I'd been using for a while. I switched to other tools because Linkjob AI's transcription had issues, and the version at the time hadn't fixed that problem yet. So, after requesting a refund, I stopped using it.
The latest version doesn't have that little issue anymore, and the development team has been working hard to update and improve the tool. I gave it another shot, and it didn't disappoint.

I didn't just take the marketing claims at face value. I personally tested every tool. I checked to see if the AI followed the interview structure and if its feedback showed empathy. I wanted my story to sound natural, not stiff and robotic. I also made sure the tool supported my choices and allowed me to lead the conversation.
Privacy is super important to me. I made sure the tool only collected the info I needed, like my name and qualifications. I was wondering if it would scrape my social media content or use my data without my knowledge. I also looked for options to request a human review or speak with a live person if I had concerns.
Here's a quick checklist I used:
Can the AI keep my story coherent and on-topic?
Does it show that you understand me and my style?
Can I see and control the data being collected?
Is there a way to get someone's help or have a manual review?
I've been testing out Linkjob AI, and it's definitely meeting all my needs. It's replaced those clunky, subpar tools and gives me peace of mind. I feel totally in control of the preparation process and my data. I can trust this process, which allows me to focus on showcasing my true skills.
Tip: Don’t settle for the first AI tool you find. Test it yourself, ask questions, and make sure you stay in control. The right assistant will help you shine, not hold you back.

Switching from Lockedin AI trash to a better AI assistant felt overwhelming at first. I broke the process into small steps to make it easier. Here’s what worked for me:
I listed out what frustrated me most—lag, freezes, and irrelevant answers.
I researched new AI tools and checked if they fit my needs.
I backed up my old notes and interview prep materials.
I set up a trial period with the new assistant, so I could test features without pressure.
I reached out to support resources like Final Round AI for interview reports and Linkjob AI for real-time interview assistance.
Adapting my workflow took some trial and error. I wanted the new AI to fit into my routine, not the other way around. Here’s how I made the transition smoother:
I looked for tools that integrated with apps I already used, like Slack and Google Meet.
I made sure I could override the AI’s suggestions if they didn’t feel right.
I joined training sessions to learn practical tips and see real examples.
I gave feedback to the AI team when something didn’t work as expected.
I kept communication open with mentors and peers to share what worked and what didn’t.
This approach helped me trust the new system and avoid the friction I felt with Lockedin AI trash.

Keeping quality high became my top priority. I didn’t want to fall back into old habits. Here’s my ongoing strategy:
I use AI as a supplement, not a replacement, for my own research and prep.
I built a searchable library of my past interview stories and let the AI help organize them.
I test my answers with the AI to spot weak spots and anticipate follow-up questions.
I review company values and tailor my responses with the AI’s help.
After each interview, I analyze my performance and update my prep materials.
I noticed big improvements after making the switch. My new AI assistant transcribes meetings with 95% accuracy, creates summaries, and integrates with my favorite apps. I can search past sessions and get context-aware advice. These changes made my workflow smoother and my prep more effective.
Improvement Type | Description |
|---|---|
Transcription Accuracy | 95% accuracy in meetings, better than before. |
AI-Generated Summaries | Quick summaries and action items boost productivity. |
Searchable Meeting History | Easy to find info from past interviews. |
Integration with Apps | Works with Zoom, Google Meet, and more. |
Contextual Intelligence | Understands my style and adapts feedback. |
Note: Reliable AI assistants work best when you combine them with your own effort and honest feedback.
I usually try refreshing the tool first. If the lag keeps happening, I switch to my backup plan. That's either using a different tool (I usually use Linkjob AI) or, depending on the situation, trying to finish the interview on my own.
Basically, just trust your own judgment. From what I've seen, problems with LinkedIn AI usually come from gaps in professional knowledge or how it's used, or sometimes it just hallucinates. So, I think the best plan is to use your own knowledge to check the info.
I always read the privacy policy first. I try not to share sensitive information unless I trust the platform. If I'm not sure about the data handling practices, I look for other tools. My general rule of thumb is that if it makes me uncomfortable, I don't share it.
I give the AI clear, specific prompts, and I look at its feedback closely. Sometimes, picking models and tools that make sense and work well can actually lead to surprisingly good results.
My Experience With LockedIn AI: A Comprehensive Review
Evaluating Six Top AI Assistants For Tech Interviews
Top Alternatives To AI Interview Assistants You Should Consider