
When I got a new interview invite, I found myself asking: Is it really possible to fool Bryq's security system in 2026? It's pretty common for people to cheat in online assessments. Almost half of the students say they've cheated on similar tests, especially during the pandemic when loads of exams moved online.
I tried lots of different methods, like desktop and browser-based real-time AI interview assistants, phone connection ones, and browser extensions. In the end, I went with a standalone, stealthy desktop AI interview assistant and passed that Bryq test with flying colours.
I've also had invites to test out other platforms and have been looking into how to cheat during Microsoft Teams meetings, as well as how to get around CodeSignal's anti-cheating detection. If your online assessment is based on these platforms, you can click here to see how I did it for reference.

Before trying any tricks, I did some research to see how Bryq's system stops candidates from cheating. It basically takes standard testing methods and adds some extra features. When you combine this with replayable logs and the ability for human intervention, it creates what seems to be a foolproof anti-cheating system, but still, I beat it with Linkjob AI, an invisible AI for interviews.

Bryq's test has a security and anti-cheating system to keep things fair by keeping an eye on behaviour and technology as it happens. It'll do IP tracking, focus loss detection, and developer tool detection, plus there's optional video verification as well. Each candidate is put into one of three levels of risk (Clear, Warning, Suspicious). It runs itself, so there's no need to set anything up, and it means that all an interviewer needs to do is start a test and see how candidates work.

Here’s a quick look at some other main anti-cheating measures:
Anti-Cheating Measure | Description |
|---|---|
Proctoring and Timed Questions | Webcam monitoring and strict time limits |
Controlled Mode of Administration | Registration required for access |
Content Interchangeability | Different question types and randomization |
Disablement of Copy-Paste | Prevents copying or pasting answers |
Single-Use Invitations | Unique links for each candidate |
Bryq keeps an eye on the digital environment:
Distraction detection: The system will send you an alert when a candidate leaves the assessment window or switches tabs.
Apparently, this is flagged as looking up answers or using an AI assistant – or at the very least, as a yellow alert – if there are signs of it.
Checking for developer tools: Bryq can spot when people are trying to use browser developer tools to view page code or mess around with assessment content.
Plugins that are designed to extract assessment content by parsing code don't work in these cases.
IP and Session Monitoring: The platform flags changes in IP addresses to detect account sharing, location spoofing, or proxy testing.
Browser Permissions: The system keeps an eye on whether important permissions (like the camera or screen sharing) are disabled during the test to avoid being detected.
As well as flagging up any technical issues, Bryq looks at how candidates interact with the test.
Response Time: The AI can spot if a candidate's response is way too fast or slow compared to how complex the question is. This might suggest that they're "copy-pasting" from an AI or some other source.
Operation Logs: The system keeps track of questions that have been skipped and how people interact with the site (clickstreams), and it can spot if something seems a bit off or if there's something strange going on.
Copy/Paste Blocking: This feature is switched off during the assessment to stop candidates easily transferring questions to outside tools.
One thing to bear in mind is that Bryq doesn't actually do continuous video recording, but it does offer optional video proctoring settings:
Video Snaps: The system takes regular pictures to confirm the candidate is there.
Multi-Participant Detection: AI can tell you if there's more than one face in the frame.
Identity Verification: Each candidate is sent a one-time invitation link that's tied to their specific access point, so we can make sure the person taking the test matches the registered information.
Basically, this means making sure the candidate is there the whole time and that there are no other people helping them. It's designed to stop people from using proxies or VPNs, and it can even stop common cheating methods like virtual machines.
Visual and Task-Based Question Types: Questions usually involve things like visual logic, timed tasks and simulated scenarios.
I've had similar issues myself; even when I tried to open a GPT page to copy and paste questions while taking the test, it was tricky to get a full answer straight away.
The randomisation process: During each test session, the order of the questions and answers is changed so that no two candidates see the same order.
Question Exposure Limits: Questions are retired after a certain number of uses to stop them from leaking into public question banks or groups.
These measures mainly target the creation and tracking of external question banks to stop test questions being leaked. If you look hard enough, you can still find some questions, but you can't be sure how recent they are or whether the details match exactly.
All my data is processed by the proctoring engine and assigned a colour-coded risk level:
🟢 Normal (Green): Behaviour is normal and meets expectations.
🟠 Warning (Orange): We've noticed some unusual activity, like you switching tabs a lot. This needs to be checked out by a recruiter.
🔴 Suspicious (Red): There's a pretty high chance of misconduct (e.g. opening developer tools or disabling the webcam).
Next, I'm going to show you the method I came up with to beat the Bryq test. I'll see if it actually works and how useful it is in helping me pass.

I like Linkjob AI best. It's an invisible AI assistant that you can use on your desktop. It has a window that you can't see, and it listens to your interview in real time or captures your screen using keyboard shortcuts. It then provides detailed answers, as you can see in the image below:

For me, the pros of this tool are:
There's no need to hide anything, which lets me focus fully on the test content.
I can control the pace of the test and only identify and solve tricky problems.
As long as it's set up properly, I can avoid leaving the test window and won't have to look away.
I can use completely invisible global hotkeys during the test to control various operations, avoid suspicious mouse movements and reduce suspicion.
But, there's actually one small issue:
Tools like Linkjob AI often need updates, and sometimes certain versions can have delays or errors, meaning I have to test them first and talk to the support team. This means there might be a few more steps involved in the prep. Also, you'll need a subscription to access all the services.

But for me, as long as I can pass the Bryq test, these drawbacks are nothing. I mean, I'm looking to land a new job after all!
I also thought about whether I could do my test using an AI interview assistant that didn't need downloading – specifically, a browser extension. I launched Linkjob AI's mock interview mode, opened a mock interview video (which I randomly found on YouTube) and did the test using Sensei AI. Here's a screenshot from that time:

I couldn't see Linkjob AI at all, even when I was sharing my screen in full-screen mode, and I couldn't find it in the dock either.
But Sensei AI didn't work at all – it could only stay hidden when I shared its tab. So as soon as the interviewer asked me to switch to full-screen sharing, it would be completely exposed. Plus, Bryq takes full-screen screenshots of my computer every so often, which would definitely make me look like a cheater.
Also, I couldn't take screenshots using any keyboard shortcuts. I think this'll probably do the job for a standard video interview, but I don't reckon it'll work when you're using an OA platform like this.

Yeah, I gave another common type of AI interview assistant a go too. You just enter a link to the interview or assessment, then connect the whole process to your phone or a second device, which gives you real-time answers.
I did think this was a good idea at first, but after doing a few practice tests, I changed my mind.
First, I found myself constantly distracted by the other screen, which meant I couldn't focus on the test.
Second, I know that Bryq's monitoring includes eye-tracking, which means I could only glance at the screen very quickly each time, or go to great lengths to position the device next to my computer screen without the interviewer noticing.
I only managed to get into the online meeting twice out of the four tests I did. The other two times, the page just kept loading. If I saw this in a real interview, it would be a deal-breaker.
In the end, I found that the AI interview assistant models from the third-party tools I discovered were either too outdated or didn't disclose the models they were using at all.

Linkjob AI has over a hundred models on offer, including Claude Opus, Grok 3 and more. I think it's really important that they disclose these models to build credibility. I just can't fully trust tools that don't meet this standard.
After thinking about all the points we talked about, I decided to go with Linkjob AI and subscribe to the annual membership to help me with my Bryq test. During the test, I managed to solve a couple of really tricky problems using its smart recognition and quick debugging features.
For me, when I was looking for a desktop-based invisible assistant like Linkjob AI, the most important things to me were that it could stay hidden all the time, that the support team was super quick to reply, and that the software kept being updated. All these factors led me to choose Linkjob AI in the end.
If you're also finding the Bryq test tricky, I'd suggest this desktop AI copilot. It's outperformed many other competitors!
If the extension helps me with basic things like what Grammarly does, it would be okay. But if I use something that has a connection with alter or read the original codes, the system would flag me.
Bryq's system will flag you as a yellow or red flag, and after the whole test, your interviewer will be the one who checks all the logs and decides whether you are a cheater.
Yes, Bryq uses webcam proctoring. But it was not the whole time; instead, Bryq introduces screen snaps and continuous checks for connection with the webcam, and screen sharing features.
Strategies to Navigate HackerEarth Proctoring in 2026
My Experience Evading Sherlock AI Detection During 2026 Interview
Ways to Successfully Outsmart Mettl Exam in 2026